On the homogeneity and heterogeneity of Latin America as a region and the notion of discourse history

There is no question that the existence of a region called “Latin America” is a “reality,” and one which is indeed both acknowledged from the inside of the region and from its outside. What is debatable, of course, is the ontological character of this “reality.” No one – and most definitely no historian – would try, in the 21st century, to seriously argue for a continental spirit, soul or essence based on transcendental forces or on biology that could exhaustively, or even to a significant extent, explain the Latin American condition. It is self-evident, or so it seems, that historical processes and very contingent – but also very powerful – cultural formations have shaped, and are constantly shaping, what we have come to see as a unified region, giving its existence the appearance of a natural fact that is, however, ultimately a compelling fiction.[1]

Some authors, however, take the “constructedness” of Latin America more into account than others. In their introduction to The Other Mirror, for instance, Miguel Angel Centeno and Fernando López-Alves do not even see the need to clarify the concept – a rather significant lack in the context of a book on “grand theory through the lens of Latin America,” to quote the volume’s subtitle. For his part, Victor Bulmer-Thomas, in The Economic History of Latin America, starts his “overview” with a short discussion of the term (he even provides a distinct date [1856] when it was coined – 1) and in fact goes as far as proposing a restrictive definition from which, for example, “Puerto Rico is often excluded […] in the twentieth century” (2). Finally, in Afro-Latinoamérica, George Reid Andrews states from the outset what he means when he writes about “Latin America,” namely “el grupo de países americanos gobernados desde el siglo XVI al XIX por España o Portugal” (18) – a definition which, by the way, would probably appeal, in its succinctness and practicality, the likes of James Lockhart and Stuart Schwartz (Early Latin America) or Tulio Halperín-Donghi (Contemporary History of Latin America), but maybe repel David Weber (Bárbaros) and Ann Twinam (Public Lives, Private Secrets), who prefer referring to “Spanish America” instead of “Latin America” in order, perhaps, to reduce their object of study’s diversity and thus deliver apparently more stringent, if less ambitious, work.

This is important inasmuch as that all these works have to somehow come to terms with the fundamental implausibility of such a vast expanse of land (as emphasized in Pedro Cunill Grau’s La geohistoria, for instance [15]) and such a proliferation of independent countries constituting a single region and, still, being considered one. In other words, one of the most crucial questions that emerge in some of these books (most especially, and for fairly obvious reasons, in the ones that pretend to be general histories of Latin America as a whole) is precisely what it is that holds the different parts of the region together.

Needless to say, and as mentioned in Andrews’ definition quoted above, the decisive factor seems to be, quite clearly, the colonial experience under the rule of the two Iberian powers. While this conclusion might strike as commonsensical, it is the object of many debates as to what differentiates this particular colonial experience from the one of, say, the Philippines; as to what could possibly be the weight of the common experience after almost two hundred years of independence, and especially considering the vastness of the subcontinent and its relative historic lack of inter-connectedness; and as to what is particular to Iberian colonialism in contradistinction to French, English or Dutch colonialism; among other questions.

To deal with this last issue, namely with the distinctiveness of Spanish and Portuguese colonialism, Lockhart and Schwartz emphasize what they call “Iberian ways,” i.e. pre-Conquest demographic, social, cultural, institutional, economic, and ideological structures that, given the quite compact character of the peninsula, as well as its common history and traditions of cultural and commercial exchange, were relatively homogeneous. These structures, they suggest, were exported to the New World and, while they were differently applied and adapted depending on local conditions and on their class with “indigenous ways,” they nevertheless constituted a common referent that explains the remarkable uniformity of Latin America.

This uniformity manifests itself in similar responses to stimuli, in similar institutional formations and in similar cultural fabrics. In The Hour of Eugenics, for instance, Nancy Leys Stepan is concerned only with a very concrete historical phenomenon (the rise of a clearly native eugenics tradition in Latin America) in very concrete geographical coordinates (Argentina, Brazil and Mexico), but her study shows nonetheless that “a Latin family likeness in eugenics existed” (15) that, in all its intrinsic heterogeneity, was different to the world of eugenics outside the subcontinent. As for David de Ferranti’s report to the World Bank “Inequality in Latin America,” as well as Kelly Hoffman and Miguel Angel Centeno’s article “The Lopsided Continent,” both rather impressively show that Latin America is a coherent, unified region, if only because of its degree of endemic inequality (interestingly, the single most unequal country of all, Brazil, which in both texts is presented as being almost an exception in its extreme character, is also the one that was colonized by the Portuguese and not by the Spaniards, perhaps accounting for a nuance in the “Iberian ways”). Finally, Néstor García Canclini offers, in his book Culturas híbridas, a model based on the concept of “hybridization” as the socio-cultural processes by which “estructuras o prácticas discretas, que existían en forma separadas, se combinan para generar nuevas estructuras, objetos y prácticas” (14), therefore creating a kind of cultural unity, however unstable, out of disorder and diversity.

García Canclini’s stress on diversity and on the ways it is negotiated and hybridized is consistent with his anthropology and cultural studies background, but it is also symptomatic of one of the main preoccupations of virtually all the readings we had for the class and, arguably, of any imaginable attempt to seriously talk about Latin America, namely the subcontinent’s stunning heterogeneity in spite of its relative uniformity. Quite literally, there is no way to not see that the region is actually not unified at all but plural and, in fact, that the “region” seems to be better represented as a multiplicity of regions (or cultures) whose sum, moreover, is much larger than its parts.

Once again, Lockhart and Schwartz provide us with a synthetic concept that can help us deal with this fundamental diversity. If there were, in their view, “Iberian ways” that explained the region’s coherence, there were also “indigenous ways” that decisively determined the settlement and colonization in the different parts of the continent and, hence, influenced the historical processes that ended up in the myriad of different cultures and republics that constitute Latin America. Thus, it made a difference if the different areas were populated, in pre-Conquest America, by nomadic, semi-sedentary or sedentary peoples (34ff), and the interaction and constant conflicts between “Iberian ways” and “indigenous ways” created different outcomes in different places. Indeed, they go as far as postulating that “Indian peoples and the resources of their lands were the primary determinants of regional differentiation” (59).

In a similar fashion, albeit in one more focused on geographical and natural peculiarities, Cunill Grau studies the history of the subcontinent as one in which different peoples – no matter if native or foreign – fought against the constrictions imposed onto them by different habitats (mountains, tropical forests, lowlands and deserts, for instance) and, in so doing, created distinctive responses that, once added up, amounted to distinctive societies. In An Environmental History of Latin America, for his part, Shawn Miller also addressed the interactions between human populations and the natural settings on which their history took place, and which their history profoundly modified, always insisting, however, on the notion of sustainability (his main concern) and how it is attained, or not, by the combination of four different but interrelated aspects of the human/nature equation: population, technology, attitudes toward nature and attitudes toward consumption (4).

Other authors are more interested in how diversity manifests itself in institutional and structural ways or, to put it somehow differently, in the realms of the political and the economical. Halperín-Donghi, for example, writes an extensive history of the subcontinent as one in which different historical processes, implicitly conceptualized as national histories, coexist. He does not often, if ever, resort to generalizations other than the most obvious ones concerning the historical periods (Independence, for instance, or the period of emergence of the neocolonial order), and in fact one possible criticism of his book is that there is a hiatus between the general points he is trying to make at the beginning of each chapter and the painstaking recount of apparently disconnected national developments.

In his own aforementioned study about the economic history of the region, for his part, Bulmer-Thomas goes deep into detail to show how a series of factors affected the way each independent nation is now, including natural resources, immigration and, most especially, policies toward economic diversification and transfer of resources to the non-export sectors (policies which, he concludes, never amounted to much in Latin America as a whole, anyway, and not even in the exceptional cases of Uruguay and Argentina). His economic history, thus, reflects on the causes and results of the segmentation between regions and countries, making it difficult to simply take for granted that, say, Honduras is even in the same world as Chile, let alone in the same region. For different reasons (not the least of which is the simultaneous adoption of similar economic paradigms at specific times, as in the inward looking period after World War II), however, he, just like all other authors mentioned, accepts the basic commonality of all parts of the region, even while highlighting some major differences within it.

In a different way, Andrews’ already quoted study contributes to the conceptualization of the region as diverse and fragmented by showing that the lines of division between the multiple components of Latin America run not only along geographical, political or economic axes, but along racial ones, too. Calling one constitutive element of the subcontinent “Afro-Latinoamérica,” after all, is tantamount to acknowledging the distinctiveness of the African diaspora’s experience in a given context, and therefore the existence of “another” Latin America. The importance of this for the notion of the region as not being a single, coherent and unified one is twofold. On the one hand, this “other” Latin America is explicitly a reality that changes and manifests itself only in certain latitudes, namely in areas with a population of African descent of 5% or more (18). On the other hand, and more fundamentally, the concept of “Afro-Latinoamérica” implies the existence of not only one but several possible Latin Americas, starting, of course, with Indian Latin America (even though, of course, one could come up with almost innumerable subdivisions here [Quechua Latin America, Nahuatl Latin America, “Savage” Latin America (a little bit like in Bárbaros), etc.]) and going on, from there, to Chinese Latin America, Japanese Latin America, Arab Latin America, Female Latin America, Queer Latin America, etc.

Mala Htun’s book Sex and the State, for instance, is an attempt to provide a gendered look at questions of sovereignty and social change, as well as of resistance under undemocratic regimes, using the issues of abortion, divorce, and attitudes toward family structures as indicators. This is, of course, a very specific approach that, moreover, is only applied to three rather similar countries of the continent (Brazil, Argentina and Chile). Nevertheless, it tells a story worth noticing, given that it is a part of the history Latin America that has traditionally been silenced (for all their exhaustiveness, neither Cunill Grau nor Halperín-Donghi even mention gender difference in their work, for example) and which, more to the point of the topic of this essay, given that it further theorizes the region as a place where different elements converge and clash, constituting not one but multiple cultures and, in a sense, not one but several “regions.”

This is also the case, of course, in Twinam’s study of the concepts of honor and illegitimacy in late eighteenth century Spanish America, and how this concepts, the debates on them, and the different legal and custom systems that delineated by these debates, created a specific order that, no matter the “artificiality” of its premises (“honor” being a concept that nowadays has almost no relevance in Latin America, or at least not in the sense it had in the times of the Bourbon reforms), constituted reality for the people imbued in it and, therefore, most definitely affected their lives and their legacy to future generations. Her book, thus, while being very specific and coming from a distinctive position (gender studies and, for lack of a better term now, historical constructivism), offers insights into an aspect of the subcontinent’s history that has been neglected, suggesting that there are different histories on different Latin Americas that remain to be told before there can even be an attempt to “synthetize” them again.

In fact, in my opinion the single most persuasive and useful approach to history is the “constructivist” one, which I will further call discourse history, as exemplified by Twinam’s book, but also by Stepan’s, García Canclini’s (even if his book hardly counts as “history”) and, to a certain extent, Weber’s. Explicitly discussed by Stepan in her introduction, constructivism in regard to science is the assumption that “science is a highly social activity and is not sealed off from the values of the society in which it is practiced” (9) as well as something that does not depict “‘reality’ in any straightforward or transparent fashion but rather as constructing or creating the objects it studies and giving them their empirical weight and meaning” (11). Translated to our own “science,” discourse history does not conceptualize history as an objective reality that can be revealed by means of scientific methods of inquire, but rather as discursive fields in which different narratives and ways to explain the world intersect and, through complex mechanisms that not merely – and not even mainly – involve economic pressures, get naturalized as truth or knowledge (or get marginalized as fiction and myth) and, thus, end up constituting what we call reality. In other words, the past is not there to be discovered, but is recreated each time we talk about it, as a result of a constant tension between the content of sources and the meaning we give them according to our own values and living conditions. Furthermore, the present is not transparent, either, and it is always the result of the more or less conflictive negotiation of narratives and ideological formations that are real, for us, but that, just like the whole notion of eugenics or (better yet, since it is less “obviously” flawed) of eighteenth century honor in Spanish America.

When taken seriously, and to its consequence, this approach is much more controversial, much more radical, and much more difficult to apply than what it looks like at first sight. If discourse is that which constitutes the thing it is pretending to talk about, it means that categories like race, gender, and sex and gender, which are ostensibly biological, do not exist in the first place, but are rather constituted by centuries of iteration. The same goes for other social realities that are more evidently constructed, like national limits, but also for our certainties concerning the scientific method itself and, most decisively in this context, the primacy of certain ranges of historical experience (say, the economy or politics) as opposed to other ones (sexual diversity and practices, body history, the making of masculinities, concepts of aging and health, models of beauty, etc.). Of course, one could say that “everyone knows” that race, for instance, is constructed, but the fact is that the agreement on this really goes only as far as accepting that “all human beings are equal, no matter their race,” without challenging the divisive categories themselves. If, however, we acknowledge that even this equality commandment is a cultural construction, exactly like – to stay at the same example – race, we will not have destroyed the fiction or its effect of reality, but we will have opened a window for the proliferation of studies on how this reality has been constructed, constantly rearticulated, and changed. This, moreover, may result in the gradual sedimentation of alternative truths and knowledge about this reality’s “constructedness” that may add up to small shiftings or breaks in its seemingly even surfaces. After all, the more or less general acceptance among social scientists and humanities scholars of the category of race as a “constructed” one is in itself a result of discursive shiftings and breaks that have taken place in the last decades, and by no means the recognition of an objective fact.

The implications of this for conceptualizing a region so heterogeneous as Latin America (and especially specific aspects of Latin America) are many, the single most important one being the one related to the term itself: When did it emerge and why, who was excluded by it, who continues to be excluded from it? What does it mean for such a diverse region to present itself, and to be considered, a region, especially in the context of globalization and transnational migration? Who are we and why, and why does it matter?

[1] This is not to say that this “fiction” does not result in an order in our practices and discourses, thus creating a “reality” that determines who we are and what we can, or even want to, do. As Michael Taussig puts it, “[w]ith good reason postmodernism has relentlessly instructed us that reality is artifice yet […] not enough surprise has been expressed as to how we nevertheless get on with living, pretending […] that we live facts, not fictions. […] If life is constructed, how come it appears so immutable?” (Mimesis and Alterity. New York: Routledge 1993, pp. xvii-xviii)

 

(Crédito de imagen de thumbnail: http://kr.123rf.com/photo_48120839_stock-vector-cartoon-hand-drawn-doodles-on-the-subject-of-latin-american-style-theme-seamless-pattern-colorful-ve.html. Crédito de imagen de inicio de post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-ySZqwQ1dA).

42 Comments

  1. BR sells their products below five systems with identify of ice cream, cakes, sundaes, beverages and prepacks. They have other promotional plans individually or as subprogram of any other software programs.

  2. Hello! This post could not be written any better! Reading through this post reminds me of my good old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!

  3. You’re so awesome! I don’t believe I have read anything like this before.
    So nice to discover someone with unique thoughts on this topic.
    Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up. This site is something that’s needed
    on the internet, someone with some originality!
    0mniartist asmr

  4. Good day! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you
    if that would be ok. I’m absolutely enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.
    0mniartist asmr

  5. Cool blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere? A theme like yours with a few simple adjustements would really make my blog jump out. Please let me know where you got your design. With thanks

  6. I’m impressed, I have to admit. Rarely do I come across a blog that’s both equally educative and engaging, and let me tell you, you’ve hit the nail on the head. The problem is something that not enough people are speaking intelligently about. I’m very happy I stumbled across this during my hunt for something relating to this.

  7. Hello! I’ve been reading your website for some time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you
    a shout out from Houston Texas! Just wanted to say keep up the great job!

  8. Great blog right here! Additionally your site loads up
    very fast! What web host are you the use of? Can I am getting your affiliate hyperlink for your host?
    I wish my site loaded up as fast as yours lol

  9. Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The text in your article seem to be running off the screen in Chrome.
    I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something
    to do with browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know.
    The design look great though! Hope you get the problem resolved soon. Cheers

  10. I am extremely inspired together with your writing abilities
    as neatly as with the format on your weblog.

    Is this a paid theme or did you customize it your self? Anyway stay up the excellent
    high quality writing, it’s uncommon to peer a
    nice blog like this one today..

  11. It’s really a great and helpful piece of information. I’m glad that you just shared this
    helpful info with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.

  12. An intriguing discussion is definitely worth comment.
    I believe that you need to publish more on this subject, it may not be a taboo matter but
    typically folks don’t discuss such subjects. To the next!
    Best wishes!!

  13. Heya i’m for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It truly useful
    & it helped me out a lot. I hope to give something back and
    aid others like you helped me.

  14. Everyone loves what you guys are up too. Such clever work and exposure!
    Keep up the very good works guys I’ve included you guys to my own blogroll.

  15. scoliosis
    I take pleasure in, cause I found exactly what I used to be looking for.

    You’ve ended my 4 day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day.
    Bye scoliosis

  16. scoliosis
    If some one desires expert view on the topic of running a blog afterward i advise him/her to go to see this website, Keep up the good job.

    scoliosis

  17. scoliosis
    Hey! I know this is somewhat off-topic however I needed
    to ask. Does building a well-established blog like yours require a lot
    of work? I am brand new to running a blog but I do write in my diary on a daily basis.
    I’d like to start a blog so I will be able to share my personal experience and feelings online.
    Please let me know if you have any recommendations or tips for brand new aspiring blog owners.
    Appreciate it! scoliosis

  18. I read this paragraph completely about the comparison of latest and earlier technologies, it’s remarkable article.

  19. An added important component is that if you are a mature person, travel insurance regarding pensioners is something you should make sure you really take into consideration. The more aged you are, the more at risk you’re for having something undesirable happen to you while abroad. If you are definitely not covered by some comprehensive insurance cover, you could have some serious problems. Thanks for expressing your suggestions on this web site.

  20. Just want to say your article is as surprising. The clarity in your publish is just nice
    and i can suppose you’re knowledgeable in this subject.
    Fine with your permission allow me to seize your feed to
    keep up to date with approaching post. Thanks one million and please keep up
    the gratifying work.

  21. Does your blog have a contact page? I’m having a tough time locating it
    but, I’d like to send you an email. I’ve got some creative ideas for your blog you
    might be interested in hearing. Either way, great blog and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.

  22. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any problems of plagorism
    or copyright infringement? My site has a lot of exclusive
    content I’ve either created myself or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the internet without my agreement.
    Do you know any ways to help reduce content from being
    ripped off? I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  23. It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy.

    I have read this post and if I could I desire to suggest you few interesting things or advice.

    Maybe you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I want to read even more things about it!

  24. Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good results. If you know of any please share. Cheers!

  25. Tremendous things here. I am very satisfied to look your article.
    Thank you a lot and I am taking a look ahead to contact you.
    Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?

  26. This is a classic drinking game that can be played with or without alcohol over video chat. If you’re a fan of Pictionary, this game is sure to tickle your fancy. VGN Let’s Draw is a fun variant of Pictionary that lets you play the beloved game virtually. Open up a private game room on the app and invite your friends and family to play. Show off your sketching skills as you attempt to give clues to your team. Choose from hilarious categories and make your clues as creative as possible. While this game is best played with a stylus and a tablet or smartphone, you can also attempt drawing with your finger or mouse for some hilarious results! We hope you have enjoyed the Zoom games for kids. Let us know if you have any other games to be added into the list. The first group to guess the most correct hymns will win the game. To make this game more challenging, try starting the song in the middle of a verse. Here is a great list of popular hymn albums These games are really great for both kids and adults. You can easily simplify them for younger kids if needed. I have played these with our high school group with much success. They will not require much except what you typically have at home: dice, paper, writing implement, and an odd object (you’ll get what I mean by that when you read the game descriptions). The games are simple to explain and can be played with minimal prep. http://franciscouwrk543108.dgbloggers.com/5224720/family-fun-zoom-games Idle heroes exchange gifts code 2019 Are you running out of resources? or do you need to farm more now? What if you know the new Idle Heroes gift Codes or event as soon as they are released? To do this, you need to know or be informed. The sources of information for the game are not secret. They are often the official media of the game. Besides, I also use them to update the site and thus you give the most reliable information possible. Often times, I use either the official site, Facebook or Twitter, or discord server. In rare cases, I search youtube. But a bit more bothersome for players with a small hero bag limit.Tap the avatar in the top left to view the profile screen. Tap the yellow “Gift card” button in the bottom right of the window. Tap and enter the gift code then press OK and tap ” Exchange “. Note: Both codes are no longer working see the new codes in the new post. Our programmers find these codes Idle Heroes and we kindly provide them to you. These cheats Idle Heroes will increase the supply of resources to the maximum and the passing game will be more fun and easy. So you can for free and without risk hacked Idle Heroes, get a lot of money. You do not need to download suspicious files, or obtain root or jailbreak law. For use secret codes Idle Heroes Android game you can simply read the instructions for writing the codes at the bottom articles.

  27. A lot of thanks for all your work on this web page. Debby take interest in doing investigations and it’s simple to grasp why. We all notice all about the lively tactic you give simple strategies through the blog and therefore cause contribution from some other people on that issue plus our favorite child is always starting to learn so much. Have fun with the rest of the new year. You have been performing a tremendous job.

  28. Hello! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I really enjoy reading your blog posts.
    Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same topics?

    Many thanks!

  29. Hey this is kind of of off topic but I was wondering if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding knowledge so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience. Any help would be enormously appreciated!

Comments are closed.